Eyes Up Here, Down There Movement

Show Me the Mammies

According to current behavioral psychology, men’s attraction to women’s breasts is supposedly a learned and cultural behavior and has no basis in nature or ancestral wiring, with no link to breastfeeding as the reason for the allure, both for men and women.  If breasts are a female feature that is culturally learned attraction for men, then what is the explanation for the women’s attraction to ripped male chest and firm buttocks?   Is it the appeal of a ripped caveman working out in a modern gym or is it just the cover of romance novels to blame for this appeal?

And then one has to ask, in a very unbalanced comparison of appearance, what attraction does the penis hold for women – either flaccid or erect.   It is obviously less attractive than the female breast, less soft, more threatening, hairy and wrinkled.  No wonder female breasts dominate media and fashion with a fascination for nip slips, side boobs and underboobs.    

So who is to blame if there is some blame to spread around; it is not men but women who have invented a million ways as possible to show their round orb off, just as the Kardashians, Elizabeth Hurley and Dolly Parton have. Can you blame men for looking at a feature, the only very obvious, constant female appearance feature (the only permanent feature of mammals with humans) that differentiates most markedly women from men? It is not the same as looking at a new hairdo, but one can say it is similar to looking at a woman in her eyes, two orbs with an iris, which are just as consistent a body part as her breasts.

To be fair, the free-the-nipple is working in the wrong direction from the-eyes-up-here movement. And men cannot help it, similar to women’s breasts. if society has not overly objectified their six-pack chests or buttocks, or a bulge below the belt. Women are just going to have to deal with an imbalance in visual body parity and take advantage of their advantage in exploiting a physical adventure, just askPaige Spiranac.